Sibling comments assert that software with unlocks demonstrates the importance of allowing "locks" on capabilities. That's the "affirming the consequent" falla

Sibling comments assert that software with unlocks demonstrates the importance of allowing "locks" on capabilities. That's the "affirming the consequent" fallacy. Specifically, siblings start from the true statement that: people buy software with locks. They then affirm the consequent, that software with locks is the correct market solution.