Yeah I misunderstood it. I never wrote a single inline assembly code in C in my life so that probably flew over my head but I hope my general message is clear:

Yeah I misunderstood it. I never wrote a single inline assembly code in C in my life so that probably flew over my head but I hope my general message is clear: don't use less letter than whats needed to be understandable and descriptive. If every C programmer thinks the same when he sees 'asm' then its great. If you have to go into the function body to find out "what the fuck is 'asm'" then its definetly not and your function name is bad and you should feel bad. Thats the message. Like... 'eval' instead of 'evaluate' is probably fine as everyone understands it (though I would vote for the latter). 'evaluate_code' is just additional noise without entropy. 'umount' or 'passwd' or 'usr' gets a sad head shake from me every time. Or function names with numbering in it. These things are just terrible.