3 ms·
The likelihood for this conversation to occur, in a way, also depends on the tool itself, and tells us something about it. As a matter of fact, git is hard to
by Ace17 7y ago
The likelihood for this conversation to occur, in a way, also depends on the tool itself, and tells us something about it.
As a matter of fact, git is hard to use.
The question is: keeping the same level of functionality, could it have been made easy to use?
- p_l 7y agoIt also speaks about the quality of users as a whole - we somehow forgot to RTFM at all or lead people to documentations, simultaneously accepting lack of documentation in a vicious cycle.
- amenod 7y agoAnd the answer is: yes, absolutely. Mercurial is a whole level better. Unfortunately git won - because of GitHub, not on technical merit.