> the government wants to be able to imprison someone indefinitely, without a jury trial, for claiming not to know something when there is certainly a reasonabl

> the government wants to be able to imprison someone indefinitely, without a jury trial, for claiming not to know something when there is certainly a reasonable doubt about them knowing it. This is incorrect. The judge could not have found Rawls in contempt if the judge was not satisfied that he intentionally failed to comply with the password disclosure order.