28 ms·
looking more for an administrative CLI for Github, rather than the usual "Github user" experience Yes. Because I already have git, which by definition already
by contingencies 7y ago
looking more for an administrative CLI for Github, rather than the usual "Github user" experience
Yes. Because I already have git, which by definition already does 99% of what I need as a user. Issues + remote repo admin + CI/CD are the exceptions.
What do you use instead of PRs?
Direct commit with no branching. IMHO PRs are an arguable misfeature of hosted RCS/VCS to keep people on those platforms. We have a high proportion of non software development projects/users.
- __float 7y agoIssues, CI/CD, and code review are a huge part of the development process that git does not do. Committing directly might work for a small team, but I can't imagine that scales. I suppose we want fundamentally different things here, and sadly for you, I don't think you're a large enough portion of the audience that GitHub will ever create the tool you need. Their APIs are open, though -- you can probably make one yourself.
- contingencies 7y agoNo, I am actually the majority of the potential market and future growth for hosted RCS/VCS firms: a tech company with many non-tech employees that wants to utilize RCS/VCS to formalize internal process across disciplines. You are the minority.