The entire point he made is that it's a bad comparison. You're saying wolves don't attack often by citing numbers in an area where they've been mostly killed o

The entire point he made is that it's a bad comparison. You're saying wolves don't attack often by citing numbers in an area where they've been mostly killed off in populated areas. There aren't many tiger attacks in North America, but that also has little bearing on future attack numbers if introducing a wild population. The comparison makes little sense.