> ‘How are we supposed to ranch and maintain our way of life when the government makes changes’ You quoted a statement that isn't in the article. > like using

> ‘How are we supposed to ranch and maintain our way of life when the government makes changes’ You quoted a statement that isn't in the article. > like using the countryside to pasture livestock as they’ve ‘done for generations’ is an inalienable birth right. I didn't get this at all from the article. Where are you picking this up? > Give me a break, everyone has to adapt with the times, ranchers should be no exception. Sure, but they have a right to defend their interests. If ranchers voted to allow wolves and bears back into downtown denver, do you think the people of denver have a right to be worried? > For all their ruggedness they honestly act like spoiled children. Are you sure you come from a rural background and you generally feel for the interests of rural folk? > ‘Wolves will affect the livelihood of my archaic, wealthy rancher lifestyle’ doesn’t really reverberate with me. Once again your quoted text appears nowhere in the article. You are intentionally misleading readers here by making it seem like you are quoting from the article and falsely attributing the quotes to the ranchers. This is actually in the article.‘Will also fears the initiative lets urban areas make a decision that'd largely affect rural Colorado.’ Why is it that so many comments that claims "I come from a rural background", "I am a resident in X", "I am a blank" go on to attack what they claim to be and mostly in a misleading and sneaky way? I normally see this in vegan related post, "I eat meat" and then goes on list the vegan manifesto, but it is spreading everywhere it seems.