I do not hire anyone, but I can mention what is my opinions of it. They shouldn't care "# of non-male identifying employees" and "# of non-white employees" (ex

I do not hire anyone, but I can mention what is my opinions of it. They shouldn't care "# of non-male identifying employees" and "# of non-white employees" (except perhaps acting in a movie, and maybe some other kind of jobs (but not computer programming), then it might matter if you are non-male or non-white or non-tall or whatever; which details is more important depend what your job is). You should hire whoever is qualify for the job, whether they are male/female, white/black, etc. Have the equal opportunity; don't force the diversity. Anyways, just having many people (even if they are all white or none white) is still having diversity because you have many different people with different ideas/experiences; they even mentioned this on the CBC radio. (Diversity of ideas is more important, I think.) But you should not prevent having non-white and non-male and so on either; if they are good at the job then they should have this job, whether they are male or not. In a construction work there might be more men than women because on average, men has more physical strength, but, nevertheless they should hire anyone who is capable and willing to do the job, regardless of man/woman. So, in the case of contsruction working it might be "naturally" biased, but, does not mean you should either enforce equality of men/women nor refuse to hire women.