4 ms·

How feasible is it to have support from 2.4 to 3.x? Either with or without 3to2/2to3 as part of the packaging process? EDIT: I'd have thought upgrading the cod

• kingkilr 16y ago
  That is precisely my goal, I think it's eminently feasible using 2to3.
• koenigdavidmj 16y ago
  The problem there is that 2.4's exception statements and 3.0's have two different meanings. 2.4 only supports this: try: do stuff except FooError, e: do stuff with e 3.0 and up choke on this; they interpret it as "catch exceptions of type FooError or e and do not give the exception object a name". 2.5 through 2.7 interpret like 2.4 but also support explicit parentheses to do what Python 3 does: try: do stuff except (FooError, BarError) as e: do stuff except (BazError, QuxError): do other stuff 2to3 requires that you use the new exception syntax only, to avoid confusion.
  • briancurtin 16y ago
    The following will work across 3 and 2 versions going back pretty far. It's necessary if you want to support pre-2.5 versions (where `as` was introduced): import sys try: fn() except (IOError, TypeError): err = sys.exc_info()[1] print(err) http://docs.pythonsprints.com/python3_porting/py-porting.html#exceptions http://docs.pythonsprints.com/python3_porting/py-porting.htm...
    • koenigdavidmj 16y ago
      Still kind of ugly, and not something which you want to litter than Django sources. Especially if you are going to put them all back when 2.4 support is dropped.