4 ms·
From my admittedly completely uninformed position, this looks so much like academics searching for some profound insight that will win a Nobel prize (or perhaps
by growlist 7y ago
From my admittedly completely uninformed position, this looks so much like academics searching for some profound insight that will win a Nobel prize (or perhaps just guarantee a tasty stream of research grants) when in reality the truth could be much simpler. Let's look at an example of a group that suffers disproportionately:
'The high level of schizophrenia in black Caribbeans living in the UK probably reflects the interaction of multiple risk factors, many of which cluster in the black Caribbean community in the UK. Particularly significant factors appear to be the combination of isolation and exclusion, both within society (living in areas of low ethnic density and reduced participation in society) and within the family (family break-up and paternal separation). These factors seem to be more powerful than socioeconomic disadvantage, which is more likely to be a consequence than causal. Racism itself may contribute to social exclusion, increasing the vulnerability to schizophrenia. Biological or genetic susceptibility do not appear to explain high rates of schizophrenia in black Caribbeans. More research is needed about the role of cannabis, particularly in its more potent forms, and whether this contributes to the excess of schizophrenia in black Caribbeans.'
Perhaps it's as simple as: people that are born blind are to some extent insulated from risk factors that are conducive of schizophrenia.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2418996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2418996/
(just the first article I could pull up on a phenomenon I was aware of)
- darawk 7y agoThat would be a reasonable explanation I think if the rates of schizophrenia were merely lower amongst the blind. But what's said here is something quite ab it stronger than that: there are zero known cases of schizophrenia among the congenitally blind. If true, and if not simply a sampling artifact, it implies something pretty profound about the nature of schizophrenia as a disorder that has hitherto not been known.
- ramraj07 7y agoWith regards to being skeptical of scientists and their motivations, I m as myopic as they come, but even to me this is a stretch. This is a legitimately interesting observation, something that does make sense given how big a role our visual cortex plays in the brain. You're right that there are risk factors but they just increase and decrease frequencies. If a factor eliminated this condition, there's definitely need to investigate that further to understand why.
- nothis 7y ago>Perhaps it's as simple as: people that are born blind are to some extent insulated from risk factors that are conducive of schizophrenia. Isn't that as interesting, too? I admit, I thought it was the takeaway of the article.