>>> Then again, we're talking about DoJ indictments of foreign soldiers for allegedly accessing data that was open to all... I just noticed that you made a pre

>>> Then again, we're talking about DoJ indictments of foreign soldiers for allegedly accessing data that was open to all... I just noticed that you made a pretty mind-boggling claim there. Is it really your position that Equifax's data was "data that was open to all"? > There was an unsubstantiated claim that something had happened in one nation, therefore we can assume it happened in some other nation! No, we can make informed speculation in a discussion. That's quite different than "assuming it [actually] happened." The main issue here is that you appear to read something, misunderstand or exaggerate it into hyperbole, then respond to your own hyperbole. That's not a good way to have a discussion with anyone.