2 ms·

This reads as coming from the disgruntled perspective of a 'turtle' who resents the strong opinions of 'rabbits' and the lack of experimentalism of 'birds'. Lit

This reads as coming from the disgruntled perspective of a 'turtle' who resents the strong opinions of 'rabbits' and the lack of experimentalism of 'birds'. Little consideration is given to the value of the other animals except as an inferior contrast to the turtles. An optimal solution would not be a 'Turtleocracy' (tyranny of turtles) but a balanced ecosystem where different strengths are given their due, and no group has tyranny over another.

aidenn0 7y ago
From the first linked page[1]: > Most organizations should not be turtleocracies. It depends on what your organization wants to do, and whether it's never been done before. > 1. When you must do things well, in the standard way, you need experts. You can put them together into an expert bureaucracy, a consultancy, etc. > 2. When most things can go poorly, but you hope some things work out, you can use people with ideas and energy without needing turtles. You can put them together into a do-ocracy or startup ecosystem. > 3. But, when you must do things well, in a way that's never been done before, you need "takeless" people, without strong ideas, who will slowly experiment over years. You can put them together into a Turtleocracy. 1: https://www.notion.so/Is-Turtleocracy-Right-for-Your-Organization-b94b794aa04d41e4b25f3560025253c7 https://www.notion.so/Is-Turtleocracy-Right-for-Your-Organiz...