I guess as I'm thinking about it and reading through the comments, I'm maybe ok with the reviews being available, although I still believe anonymity is importan

I guess as I'm thinking about it and reading through the comments, I'm maybe ok with the reviews being available, although I still believe anonymity is important as an option (although I'm not sure true anonymity can exist with publicly available text, so I go back and forth about that). I'm not convinced review quality will improve with completely open reviews, because there's too many opportunities for retribution. Sure reviews that kill papers through a thousand tiny irrelevant cuts would probably go to the wayside more often, but my guess so to would very trenchant, highly critical reviews that make important but controversial points.