3 ms·
Such a redirect isn't slow? It's near instant if done right. Here's twitter doing it: http://twitter.com/bjorntipling http://twitter.com/bjorntipling It's abso
by btipling 16y ago
Such a redirect isn't slow? It's near instant if done right.
Here's twitter doing it: http://twitter.com/bjorntipling http://twitter.com/bjorntipling
It's absolutely super fast for me. How is that a 'kicker'?
Large JS files only need to be downloaded once and are cached.
There's no problem here.
- emef 16y ago> Such a redirect isn't slow? It's near instant if done right. Here's twitter doing it: http://twitter.com/bjorntipling http://twitter.com/bjorntipling On slower devices (such as mobile phones) redirecting can be more noticeable. You're right though, in general it's not really a problem, but might be more so than a larger-than-normal JS file. > Large JS files only need to be downloaded once and are cached. Yeah, I was trying to say that. Larger JS files aren't a problem at all; load them once and they're cached.