> to work harder for less if they are able to get the employees to develop some sort of emotional attachment to the company You're implying as if it's inherent

> to work harder for less if they are able to get the employees to develop some sort of emotional attachment to the company You're implying as if it's inherently a fraud. Which means that you're implying that "emotional attachement to the company" is something that has no real value for employee - or at least not as much value as money would have. Why do you think so?