4 ms·
You seem to be demonstrating how miscommunication is very easy in the example shown! In the example, the idea is that there is one new drug that was shown to b
by DougBTX 7y ago
You seem to be demonstrating how miscommunication is very easy in the example shown!
In the example, the idea is that there is one new drug that was shown to be unsafe, but that there is a risk that the results will be misinterpreted to suggest that lots of other drugs are unsafe too. If the communication is handled well, then use of the new drug will never start, and people can continue to use other drugs which are safe.
> then the third outcome is unavoidable
Alternatively, if you mean that incorrect and misleading headlines are unavoidable... then yes, that is a persistent problem, agreed.
- umvi 7y agoIf you develop a new vaccine, and if you confirm through repeated tests that it causes elevated levels of autism, then yes, you can now say "vaccines can cause autism." Or rather, in order to now claim that vaccines don't cause autism you will need to say "rigorously tested vaccines don't cause autism"