> And yeah, I think that the really short domain names should be $XXXX per year to renew, if not more. There's damage to the internet from "evicting" people fr

> And yeah, I think that the really short domain names should be $XXXX per year to renew, if not more. There's damage to the internet from "evicting" people from these domains. Broken links, etc. Sure, that doesn't apply in this "intentionally unused" case, but... who's currently incurring what damages? Why try to squeeze more dollars out of folks with these domain names? I'm suspicious of ideas to replicate the physical real-estate model of pushing people out through raising rents that seems to just benefit landlords and the already-wealthy.