4 ms·
> Unlikely if the firm's size lets it offer better life than alternatives How do you figure? This implies the compensation is different from other "firm"s. >
by monadic2 7y ago
> Unlikely if the firm's size lets it offer better life than alternatives
How do you figure? This implies the compensation is different from other "firm"s.
> Hard if a firm's size grants it the ability to challenge monopoly on violence.
How do you figure? Monopoly typically implies private property.
> No longer possible if the firm is large enough to have vertical integration.
How do you figure? Monopoly typically implies private property.
- shadowgovt 7y agoHow does one seize a firm's assets if a firm has no private property? That implies the firm has nothing to seize because it has nothing.
- monadic2 7y ago> How does one seize a firm's assets if a firm has no private property? That implies the firm has nothing to seize because it has nothing. Well the traditional linguistic connotations of possession certainly persist. Here "seize" simply means take control of.