3 ms·
I wouldn't trust keyword analysis or word frequency to figure out why people are leaving. And unless AI has gotten a lot smarter than I'm aware of, I'd say that
by computator 7y ago
I wouldn't trust keyword analysis or word frequency to figure out why people are leaving. And unless AI has gotten a lot smarter than I'm aware of, I'd say that the only way to get a meaningful result is to actually read each blog post and then write a short 5-10 word summary. Sure, it's subjective but you'd get a lot more nuance like, "His girlfriend lives in New York", "Misses skiing and now has money to do just that", "Closer to elderly parents who need care", "New startup in Texas that's perfect fit", "Can't renew U.S. visa", "Moving to attend grad school".
The author has pared the list down to 137 blog posts, so even a fast reader would take a day to read all of them. But probably he already spent at least a day collecting that data, doing the analysis, creating the graphics, etc., so it's not crazy to suggest doing it manually. Alternatively, the list could be further cut down to 20-40 postings, which could be read in a few hours. That would result in a way more interesting (human) analysis.
EDIT: For each blog post, it would be interesting to note the sentiment of whether the person is being pushed out of San Francisco (can't afford the city, lost job, can't renew visa, etc.) or whether they are being pulled to a new location (perfect new job, girlfriend/boyfriend in different location, etc.).
- dragonwriter 7y ago> I wouldn't trust keyword analysis or word frequency to figure out why people are leaving Even if I trusted automated analysis of blog posts to tell why the authors of the posts are leaving, I wouldn't trust a non-systematic collection of 100 blog posts to reflect people who write blog posts about leaving, nor would I trust people who write blog posts about leaving to represent people who leave.
- ryanckulp 7y agototes - i did all this in < 4 hours but would love to read a more thorough analysis