4 ms·
At least 4. But it's really not at all obvious that Shadow Brokers was Russia. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-YhLDDrFIPlVVXG3EkpA7FcLSapt9JyzWEOnbeQW
by FDSGSG 7y ago
At least 4. But it's really not at all obvious that Shadow Brokers was Russia.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-YhLDDrFIPlVVXG3EkpA7FcLSapt9JyzWEOnbeQWq9g/edit#gid=1562229435&range=A3 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-YhLDDrFIPlVVXG3EkpA...
- alwayseasy 7y agoI don't see where your link points to this and I mean it's pretty obvious the Shadow Brokers were aligned with foreign policy interests of the Russian government. If it was another adversary, I don't see why they worked so hard to benefit mostly Russia.
- FDSGSG 7y ago>I don't see where your link points to this Recently there's been a lot of speculation that Shadow Brokers were in fact the "second source". That may or may not be true. >I mean it's pretty obvious the Shadow Brokers were aligned with foreign policy interests of the Russian government It's really not. Unless everything anti-US fits that mould, but then we'd have a plenty of other governments to suspect too.