My point was they appeared to be providing an observation about the change in size over time, but the wording around the time frame is so ambiguous it could mea

My point was they appeared to be providing an observation about the change in size over time, but the wording around the time frame is so ambiguous it could mean anything between one day and one year, plus the magnitude of the change didn't appear to be significant. In other words, those 2 statements in combination provide little to no extra value in understanding the organization.