3 ms·

Sure, not everything can be a web app, but a lot of the subscription world can easily be ported to web app, since the content will likely be delivered in HTML.

chc 16y ago
If you're talking desktop, I agree, since the browser has become so pre-eminent there. But for mobile, Web apps are distinctly second-tier citizens. Just installing one on your home screen is voodoo beyond the ken of most iPhone users.
- Bossman 16y ago
  It's not so bad on Android. And Google is very good at Web Apps. Try viewing the web app versions of gmail and such on your phone. They're not as full featured as the dedicated apps, but they work damn well. The big thing is making them look like real apps to the end user. No one wants to have to remember a bunch of web addresses. Something like what Chrome does on the PC is good...instead of a classic link shortcut for your desktop, it makes an "app" out of it. Giving it its own icon and name like any other program on the computer.
mryall 16y ago
Interestingly, serving e-books over HTML would destroy the DRM models that Amazon and others have developed to "protect" their content. I can't see there being a Kindle web-based reader unless Amazon takes the same road as Apple with regard to DRM [1], and tells all their content providers to get on board. [1] http://www.apple.com/fr/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/ http://www.apple.com/fr/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/
- fpgeek 16y ago
  http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html?ie=UTF8&docId=1000579091 http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html?ie=UTF8&docId=1000...
mambodog 16y ago
Unless they want any kind of DRM.
- Natsu 16y ago
  Why would you need DRM for a web app with a subscription model?
  - justincormack 16y ago
    To stop subscribers copying all the content and then unsubscribing. For services where most of the value is in the back catalogue this is a risk.
    - Natsu 16y ago
      If that's all the value you're offering your users, DRM is the least of your problems. If it's that easy for users to exhaust the content they actually want, you're going to have problems with customer retention, not to mention customer acquisition.

chc 16y ago

If you're talking desktop, I agree, since the browser has become so pre-eminent there. But for mobile, Web apps are distinctly second-tier citizens. Just installing one on your home screen is voodoo beyond the ken of most iPhone users.

Bossman 16y ago
It's not so bad on Android. And Google is very good at Web Apps. Try viewing the web app versions of gmail and such on your phone. They're not as full featured as the dedicated apps, but they work damn well. The big thing is making them look like real apps to the end user. No one wants to have to remember a bunch of web addresses. Something like what Chrome does on the PC is good...instead of a classic link shortcut for your desktop, it makes an "app" out of it. Giving it its own icon and name like any other program on the computer.

mryall 16y ago

Interestingly, serving e-books over HTML would destroy the DRM models that Amazon and others have developed to "protect" their content. I can't see there being a Kindle web-based reader unless Amazon takes the same road as Apple with regard to DRM [1], and tells all their content providers to get on board. [1] http://www.apple.com/fr/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/ http://www.apple.com/fr/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/

fpgeek 16y ago
http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html?ie=UTF8&docId=1000579091 http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html?ie=UTF8&docId=1000...

mambodog 16y ago

Unless they want any kind of DRM.

Natsu 16y ago
Why would you need DRM for a web app with a subscription model?
- justincormack 16y ago
  To stop subscribers copying all the content and then unsubscribing. For services where most of the value is in the back catalogue this is a risk.
  - Natsu 16y ago
    If that's all the value you're offering your users, DRM is the least of your problems. If it's that easy for users to exhaust the content they actually want, you're going to have problems with customer retention, not to mention customer acquisition.