4 ms·

Yep, they even say that in the link. "Today, we hold PLA hackers accountable for their criminal actions, and we remind the Chinese government that we have the

by dx87 7y ago

Yep, they even say that in the link. "Today, we hold PLA hackers accountable for their criminal actions, and we remind the Chinese government that we have the capability to remove the Internet’s cloak of anonymity and find the hackers that nation repeatedly deploys against us."

ISL 7y ago
If this ever goes to trial, the defense-discovery of how it was done will be interesting.
- bitxbitxbitcoin 7y ago
  Unless they use parallel reconstructionism to keep their (probably Tor) deanonymizing skillset on the down low.
  - ISL 7y ago
    If the prosecutors were to do so knowingly, the prosecutors would be breaking their oath to the Constitution (and simultaneously obliterating their case/perhaps committing crimes of their own).
    - LunaSea 7y ago
      Like that hasn't happened before with no consequences when investigative forces were handed a cool new toy.
    - learc83 7y ago
      The prosecutors aren't likely doing so knowingly. It's more likely that the clean evidence is what gets sent to the DOJ.
  - justnotworthit 7y ago
    That's the line that stood out to me. If so, the threat sounds like they could turn it off or reveal everyone at once, not so much a selective attack (why announce it like that then? Certainly not if you were going to use parallel reconstruction to keep the fact secret). However, the line: > 34 servers located in nearly 20 countries Doesn't describe tor. You don't use that many servers (nodes). And it's strength isn't based on number of hops. That's more old school hack a box and put in a chain. Then what's the cloak? Is their ability that they can easy "go around" somehow any X number of connections right to the source?