3 ms·
"those incumbents would have come up with something." I am convinced about the exact opposite. Apple interrupted so many different industries, all were sooner
by StreamBright 7y ago
"those incumbents would have come up with something."
I am convinced about the exact opposite. Apple interrupted so many different industries, all were sooner on the market with more resources and very good financial situation. Steve Jobs was extremely tough on staff do deliver what he wanted. He also had an extremely good 6th sense what people wanted. Combining all of these, you get Apple, lacking any of these you get the rest.
- fsloth 7y ago"I am convinced about the exact opposite." But Android was exactly created by others than Apple. So while Apple surely performed admirably, I'm not sure how you can follow historical evidence to the conclusion that "without Android no one would have competed with Apple".
- jayd16 7y agoAndroid was also not made by those incumbents. I don't necessarily agree but it seems like the point wasn't that it was impossible so much as the old guard was not capable or willing.
- microtherion 7y ago> Apple interrupted so many different industries But I can't think of a single one where Apple in the long ran dominated in volume. Apple's goal was and is always to dominate in profit in a segment. So, absent Android, I'm pretty sure there would have been another low end disruptor.