5 ms·

There’s actually laws regarding stuff sent to you in error. Basically, they can’t ask you to return it unless you offer. Hence why there’s probably no formalize

There’s actually laws regarding stuff sent to you in error. Basically, they can’t ask you to return it unless you offer. Hence why there’s probably no formalized process for it.

userbinator 7y ago
It should also not come as a surprise that a company whose process is highly optimised to move product in one direction has problems dealing with unusual situations in the other direction.
- eh78ssxv2f 7y ago
  This article is also from 2014. I wonder if the return process is smoother now.
  - mcpeepants 7y ago
    normal returns are pretty painless - I order thing, I get exactly that thing, I return thing. I imagine there's still no formal process in place for "oops we sent you a thing, keep it or throw it out or whatever"
    - User23 7y ago
      Returns are super painless now. You just click a few times on a webpage and then go to your local UPS store (or whatever you picked) show them your phone so they can scan the QR code you got sent, and then hand them the item.
      - fredophile 7y ago
        Returns of things they know they sent are painless. In the linked article there was no tracking showing the balance beam and that caused most of the problem.
    - HenryBemis 7y ago
      I had a similar experience with a hairdryer (I am bald). They refunded the cost of the item I actually ordered (not a hairdryer)(I am bald). They offered that I keep the hairdryer (still bald). They were insanely against picking it up/returning it. I guess that in their model of profitability they have included "items gone rogue" (returns are calculated in the financial statements, auditors "love" returns - especially for purchases made on year -1 and being returned on year 0)(I assume write-offs hurt less the bottom line/the auditors are less angry as long as it is not a fraudulent write-off). Back to the story, a month later they sent me the item I ordered, free of charge and a friend of mine got a lovely hairdryer on her birthday. And I honestly didn't know that hairdryers can cost more than £€$100!!!
- jrockway 7y ago
  They bought Zappos which had always been good with returns.
maxerickson 7y ago
Seems like there should be laws about being able to make them come pick shit up too. Like, a simple magic phrase that makes it clear you don't want the thing they (perhaps accidentally) dumped on you and that they should come remove it, something like "I don't want it, come take it back."
- Johnny555 7y ago
  Amazon is normally happy to do this for a return -- they'll send UPS to pick it up. But in this case, since she didn't order it, it was hard to get a correct shipping label. (which normally probably wouldn't matter -- if UPS has a shipping later for a 1 pound package of coffee and you hand them a box of shoes, the UPS driver isn't likely to know or care. But for something as large as a balance beam it's more of a problem.
  - maxerickson 7y ago
    My point is essentially that it should never be a problem for the accidental recipient and that we should judge them harshly for the cases where it is. (I don't mean they should never make a mistake, I mean they should have a robust process for dealing with the mistakes)
- arkades 7y ago
  Agreed. Although it's funny how my perspective on this has changed over time: Once, I would just be delighted that I could get a company to accept a return and not eat my money for their fuck-up. Now I take that for granted, and I demand that they come take care of the logistics of removing it from my home as well, because I have 0% intention of paying for your shipping fuck-up with my time. If you expect me to go stand on line at the UPS store to return an item I shouldn't be dealing with, I should be able to send you an invoice for my hourly rate.
lilyball 7y ago
This is not accurate. If the company intentionally sends you an item that you did not request, it's a gift and they can't demand it back. If they send you an item in error it's not a gift and you are not entitled to keep it for free.
- pietroglyph 7y ago
  This is not correct, at least in the US. You can keep it even if you didn't order it, regardless of whether or not it was sent in error. https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0181-unordered-merchandise https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0181-unordered-merchan...
  - lilyball 7y ago
    Your link doesn't refute what I said. It's talking entirely about the case where companies intentionally send you unordered merchandise and does not address the case where companies sent it to you in error.
    - wtallis 7y ago
      Nothing on that page is conditional on the sender's intentions. And the relevant law is pretty straightforward: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/39/3009 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/39/3009
      - dwild 7y ago
        > All such merchandise shall have attached to it a clear and conspicuous statement informing the recipient that he may treat the merchandise as a gift to him [...]. That part make this kind of confusing. If it doesn't, then can it still be considered a gift?
        JoeAltmaier 7y ago
        No, its still a gift, its just in violation. Still yours to keep.
Johnny555 7y ago
Amazon didn't want it back, they said she could keep it, but she didn't want it and didn't want to dispose of it: “Ok. hold on please…” Comes back 2 min later… “It sounds like it was sent in error. But no problem- you do not have to return it to us. You can keep it, or donate it to charity or just dispose of it yourself”
SmellyGeekBoy 7y ago
This comment seems to be the mail order equivalent of the "they can't legally make you stay after the bell rings in class" kid at school.
- michaelt 7y ago
  There are laws in the UK because of a historical scam, where a company mails you something you didn't order, then - perhaps months later - bills you for it at a ridiculous price. You know, mail out $20 sets of headphones with no return address, then bill people $500 a few months later.
  - atomi 7y ago
    Yeah, it's the same reasoning for these laws here in the US.
_pmf_ 7y ago
> Basically, they can’t ask you to return it unless you offer. They certainly can ask.

There’s actually laws regarding stuff sent to you in error. Basically, they can’t ask you to return it unless you offer. Hence why there’s probably no formalized process for it.

userbinator 7y ago

It should also not come as a surprise that a company whose process is highly optimised to move product in one direction has problems dealing with unusual situations in the other direction.

eh78ssxv2f 7y ago
This article is also from 2014. I wonder if the return process is smoother now.
- mcpeepants 7y ago
  normal returns are pretty painless - I order thing, I get exactly that thing, I return thing. I imagine there's still no formal process in place for "oops we sent you a thing, keep it or throw it out or whatever"
  - User23 7y ago
    Returns are super painless now. You just click a few times on a webpage and then go to your local UPS store (or whatever you picked) show them your phone so they can scan the QR code you got sent, and then hand them the item.
    - fredophile 7y ago
      Returns of things they know they sent are painless. In the linked article there was no tracking showing the balance beam and that caused most of the problem.
  - HenryBemis 7y ago
    I had a similar experience with a hairdryer (I am bald). They refunded the cost of the item I actually ordered (not a hairdryer)(I am bald). They offered that I keep the hairdryer (still bald). They were insanely against picking it up/returning it. I guess that in their model of profitability they have included "items gone rogue" (returns are calculated in the financial statements, auditors "love" returns - especially for purchases made on year -1 and being returned on year 0)(I assume write-offs hurt less the bottom line/the auditors are less angry as long as it is not a fraudulent write-off). Back to the story, a month later they sent me the item I ordered, free of charge and a friend of mine got a lovely hairdryer on her birthday. And I honestly didn't know that hairdryers can cost more than £€$100!!!
jrockway 7y ago
They bought Zappos which had always been good with returns.

maxerickson 7y ago

Seems like there should be laws about being able to make them come pick shit up too. Like, a simple magic phrase that makes it clear you don't want the thing they (perhaps accidentally) dumped on you and that they should come remove it, something like "I don't want it, come take it back."

Johnny555 7y ago
Amazon is normally happy to do this for a return -- they'll send UPS to pick it up. But in this case, since she didn't order it, it was hard to get a correct shipping label. (which normally probably wouldn't matter -- if UPS has a shipping later for a 1 pound package of coffee and you hand them a box of shoes, the UPS driver isn't likely to know or care. But for something as large as a balance beam it's more of a problem.
- maxerickson 7y ago
  My point is essentially that it should never be a problem for the accidental recipient and that we should judge them harshly for the cases where it is. (I don't mean they should never make a mistake, I mean they should have a robust process for dealing with the mistakes)
arkades 7y ago
Agreed. Although it's funny how my perspective on this has changed over time: Once, I would just be delighted that I could get a company to accept a return and not eat my money for their fuck-up. Now I take that for granted, and I demand that they come take care of the logistics of removing it from my home as well, because I have 0% intention of paying for your shipping fuck-up with my time. If you expect me to go stand on line at the UPS store to return an item I shouldn't be dealing with, I should be able to send you an invoice for my hourly rate.

lilyball 7y ago

This is not accurate. If the company intentionally sends you an item that you did not request, it's a gift and they can't demand it back. If they send you an item in error it's not a gift and you are not entitled to keep it for free.

pietroglyph 7y ago
This is not correct, at least in the US. You can keep it even if you didn't order it, regardless of whether or not it was sent in error. https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0181-unordered-merchandise https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0181-unordered-merchan...
- lilyball 7y ago
  Your link doesn't refute what I said. It's talking entirely about the case where companies intentionally send you unordered merchandise and does not address the case where companies sent it to you in error.
  - wtallis 7y ago
    Nothing on that page is conditional on the sender's intentions. And the relevant law is pretty straightforward: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/39/3009 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/39/3009
    - dwild 7y ago
      > All such merchandise shall have attached to it a clear and conspicuous statement informing the recipient that he may treat the merchandise as a gift to him [...]. That part make this kind of confusing. If it doesn't, then can it still be considered a gift?
      - JoeAltmaier 7y ago
        No, its still a gift, its just in violation. Still yours to keep.

Johnny555 7y ago

Amazon didn't want it back, they said she could keep it, but she didn't want it and didn't want to dispose of it: “Ok. hold on please…” Comes back 2 min later… “It sounds like it was sent in error. But no problem- you do not have to return it to us. You can keep it, or donate it to charity or just dispose of it yourself”

SmellyGeekBoy 7y ago

This comment seems to be the mail order equivalent of the "they can't legally make you stay after the bell rings in class" kid at school.

michaelt 7y ago
There are laws in the UK because of a historical scam, where a company mails you something you didn't order, then - perhaps months later - bills you for it at a ridiculous price. You know, mail out $20 sets of headphones with no return address, then bill people $500 a few months later.
- atomi 7y ago
  Yeah, it's the same reasoning for these laws here in the US.

_pmf_ 7y ago

> Basically, they can’t ask you to return it unless you offer. They certainly can ask.