3 ms·

Reminds me of buffer overflow attacks that repurpose/rearrange existing source code in ways that the author never anticipated to gain control of the system

• SilasX 7y ago
  lol yes I'm working through reverse engineering CTFs now, and that's what I thought of as well. It seems like this means all your laws have to be super-convoluted to be robust against individual word deletion, maybe have checksums in logical expressions scattered throughout. "I think I'll veto the 'not' here." I don't know who thought this was a good idea.
  • duskwuff 7y ago
    Clearly, the solution is embedded checksums. ;) "The following bill shall only be valid if it contains exactly 1,672 (one thousand, six hundred, and seventy-two) words."
    • iudqnolq 7y ago
      "The following bill shall be valid" :)
• yegle 7y ago
  Return-oriented programming. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return-oriented_programming?wprov=sfla1 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return-oriented_programming?...