4 ms·
150% vs Nashorn is an important caveat here. At {employer} we started our SSRing via Nashorn and later moved to a separately deployed Node service for performan
by marcusarmstrong 7y ago
150% vs Nashorn is an important caveat here. At {employer} we started our SSRing via Nashorn and later moved to a separately deployed Node service for performance reasons... and saw a 4x drop in time per request for rendering tasks.
- SubjectToChange 7y agoNashorn is deprecated though, and GraalVM is its intended replacement. So why even evaluate Nashorn for new projects?