4 ms·
> The important thing to understand is, from your communication partners point of view, you create a burden without reason They create a burden without reason.
by wolfgke 7y ago
> The important thing to understand is, from your communication partners point of view, you create a burden without reason
They create a burden without reason.
- bryan_w 7y agoHe was making a point about empathy that you seemed to miss.
- wolfgke 7y agoPerhaps I missed this point - but if the empathy point exists, the other side did not show empathy, either.
- filoleg 7y agoI think that both sides create a burden. In my opinion, the difference is that, it is a one-to-many kind of matching scenario. One person (the one opting out of using the preferred messaging method of all their friends) creates a burden to many people, while all those people create a burden just for one person. If it helps, you can try visualizing it as a fully connected graph that initially has equally weighted edges between all nodes. But then the weight of all edges connected to one specific node goes up by multiple factors. That node loses out much more than all the other nodes.
- wolfgke 7y ago> I think that both sides create a burden. In my opinion, the difference is that, it is a one-to-many kind of matching scenario. One person (the one opting out of using the preferred messaging method of all their friends) creates a burden to many people, while all those people create a burden just for one person. I personally rather observe various groups in society with very different kinds of preferences.