4 ms·
The article describes in detail why this is such a challenging project: > ... It is hard to do something truly different in the smartphone industry. Companies,
by webmobdev 7y ago
The article describes in detail why this is such a challenging project:
> ... It is hard to do something truly different in the smartphone industry. Companies, especially smaller companies, are all working from the same parts bin with the same manufacturing partners. You take your Qualcomm SoC, your Samsung display, and your Sony camera sensor—and you take a flight to China and visit Foxconn, which, in addition to manufacturing, will even do engineering for you if you want. Smartphones are so samey because they have an established, for-hire supply chain that has a certain way of doing things, and it's much cheaper, faster, and easier if you just "go with the flow" and do what everyone else is doing.
> Big companies like Samsung and Apple have enough money, control, and connections to move the supply chain in whatever direction they want ...
> ... If you haven't noticed, open source smartphone hardware is not a thing that existed before now. There have been phones that run open source builds of Android, but those are full of closed-source firmware from non-open components. The usual hardware companies cautiously guard their hardware designs and drivers, and Purism's hardline stance on open source has ruled out almost the entire established smartphone supply chain ...
> ... "When we first approached hardware manufacturers almost two years ago with this project most of them instantly said 'No, sorry, impossible, we can not help you'." Others warned us, that it could never work, that it was too complicated, 'the industry does not do that,' and so forth."
> The thing to keep in mind here is that Purism has taken on an absolutely gargantuan task. It somehow scraped together a new supply chain of mostly open source components, it came up with a smartphone design from scratch, and it is building its own smartphone distribution of Linux. Two years is not enough time to do this. The OS and app package is not nearly finished, and it lacks basic smartphone functionality. The hardware is nearly finished, but you'll have a hard time taking advantage of it right now since the power management isn't really implemented, and support for things like the cameras are non-existent. If you really want open source smartphones to be a thing, though, this is where you need to start. The Librem 5 is a proof of concept.
> "Open source at any cost" really feels like the mantra the Librem 5 was made with. That cost is going to be significant, since 1) the need to go out and build its own supply chain means Purism is doing this with zero economies of scale, and 2) the company needs funding to build the OS. Get ready for some sticker shock: the Librem 5 is currently $750. That's up from the $700 early-bird price it had in 2019, and when the "Evergreen" 1.0 version launches, the price will go up again to $800. This is high-end smartphone money—and remember, you're not really buying a finished product. The Librem 5 is only for true believers in the idea of an open source smartphone ...
- m4rtink 7y ago>open source smartphone hardware is not a thing that existed before now See, this is something I really dislike about the Librem 5 - they are pretty much trying to rewrite history to pain themselves in a better light. "We are the first ones tryin to do this, no one ever tried before, so all those bad decissions we did that make our phone unusable are not our fault!" This is of course incorrect, as they totally fail to mention the Neo FreeRunner project, a open source smartphone from ~2009: http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Neo_FreeRunner http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Neo_FreeRunner I've had it and many issues it had pretty much mirror the issues Librem 5 is having at the moment - problematic hardware component, buggy calling and issues with power management. Mybe thats why Purism fails to mention it, to hide the fact they managed to repicate the mistakes 10 years later ? Still even http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Neo_FreeRunnerwith http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Neo_FreeRunnerwith all its faults the Neo FreeRunner pretty much jumpstarted the open mobile community, with many of its users then bein involved in the Maemo and Sailfish OS communities and now with the Pinephone or Fxtec Pro1. For that reason it makes me sad how Purism fails to mention the Neo FreeRunner & paint themselves as being first. It's really rude to all the hard work the open mobile community did since then & that they are heavilly building on.
- Multicomp 7y ago> Foxtex Pro Do you get autocorrected from Fxtec Pro1 ? I've not heard of Foxtex, ducking for it appears to show speakers and monitors, but not phones.
- m4rtink 7y agoIndeed, made a typo here, fixed. :)
- Mediterraneo10 7y agoNeither Maemo nor Sailfish were "open mobile" in terms of hardware. They ran on the same kind of commodity mobile-phone hardware fraught with privacy risks as any mainstream phone, and the appeal of Librem has been that its design was going to overcome that. Also, while the software on Maemo and Sailfish devices was mostly open and hackable, the actual UI layer and some of the stock apps were closed-source.