You've been commenting dramatic responses all over this thread like this guy has personally done you harm in the past. What gives? Your arguments aren't ration

You've been commenting dramatic responses all over this thread like this guy has personally done you harm in the past. What gives? Your arguments aren't rational they're emotional and sensationalist and they seem to have no actual proof. You've taken the article as definitive proof that this man, whose done nothing with the domain for over 20 years out of concern for the general public, to be some sort of extortionist or criminal sympathizer. What's your angle here?