3 ms·
That's a fascinating article, and you may be right that little more need be said, but the author wanders WAY off the subject when he gets to the benefits of Jav
by rm445 16y ago
That's a fascinating article, and you may be right that little more need be said, but the author wanders WAY off the subject when he gets to the benefits of Java. Claiming that you can use the time saved by having garbage collection to make your program more efficient in other ways does not make a convincing argument when you're discussing fine points of performance.
In case that wasn't clear, he claims not that garbage collection is more efficient, but the saved programmer time can be used in some hand-waving way to improve efficiency. Likewise he wanders off into wooly territory with the claim that very large Java programs can be written more quickly. These would be perfectly fine if he were posting the reasons he thinks Java is better, but in a technical discussion of all-out performance it's just offtopic.
- blinkingled 16y agoStrictly speaking, what you say is true, but practically those are significant and relevant benefits of Java. Considering that performance is always a trade-off with price - if you think about price/performance ratio - the ability to write programs quickly is of relevance.