3 ms·
If you want your assistance to go straight to those who need it - then walk right to that person and give it to them. If you want someone who is experienced in
by alanwreath 7y ago
If you want your assistance to go straight to those who need it - then walk right to that person and give it to them. If you want someone who is experienced in making said assistance stretch further than just to that one family, ask someone experienced. Complaining seems like you don't trust the person to whom you just put in charge of using your donation wisely. So why was the donation made again?
Obviously one would expect the charity to report yearly on their endeavors - since no aid may be going out at all - however, reporting on each dollar would be a tad difficult to track. So not sure what would be required here.
Emptying out said donations all in one go (to avoid the perception of hoarding say all 100 billion) may not be good either since problems today may be more bearable than problems tomorrow. So not sure what would be required here either.
Probably the best remedy of those who do not wish to trust the Lds charities, would be to stop donating to them.
- darksaints 7y ago> Probably the best remedy of those who do not wish to trust the Lds charities, would be to stop donating to them. And the best recourse for people who spent significant sums of money donating to a charity that misrepresented their charitable actions and has acted more like a for profit business would be to initiate a class action suit for fraud and to remove the fake charity's tax exempt status.
- cheez 7y ago> If you want your assistance to go straight to those who need it - then walk right to that person and give it to them Meanwhile, people want grand government projects to "help the middle class" but won't give Yang's UBI a shot.