FWIW, I quoted that verse because that's the default scripture Mormons quote when you ask why they pay tithing, in my experience, and so I took the liberty of a

FWIW, I quoted that verse because that's the default scripture Mormons quote when you ask why they pay tithing, in my experience, and so I took the liberty of assuming that's probably what Christensen would say. But now you have me interested, so: > When you read the previous chapters and verses you will see that Malachi, as God's mouthpiece, is accusing the Church leaders of embezzling Given that this statement is based on the author's interpretation of 17th century english (KJV) translated from Hebrew, I'm a bit surprised by the confidence here (and the confidence with which you repeat it). I'm no biblical scholar, but I just read Malachi 2 and 3, and came away with the same impression as before, that the bit about tithes was addressed to all of the nation of israel. The author of that post seems to be primarily drawing the conclusion from their interpretation here: > "Will a man rob God? Well You have robbed me, even this whole nation!" In other words, the priest class had been robbing the whole nation Many other translations do not permit this interpretation, which is possible due to the ambiguity in the KJV of whether "even this whole nation" modifies "you" or "me". NIV: "You are under a curse—your whole nation—because you are robbing me." NABRE: "You are indeed accursed, for you, the whole nation, rob me." NET: "You are bound for judgment because you are robbing me—this whole nation is guilty." NRSV: "You are cursed with a curse, for you are robbing me—the whole nation of you!" CSB: "You are suffering under a curse, yet you—the whole nation—are still robbing me." So maybe it is directed at the priests, maybe it isn't, but the understanding that it is directed at the priests isn't unique to the LDS church, as that post seems to suggest ("testament to our willingness for self-indoctrination that so many Latter-day Saints constantly...").