4 ms·
Let's leave off the hostilities and spurious accusations please. Your confiscation point is valid. I don't know that is an equitable solution because private p
by mythrwy 7y ago
Let's leave off the hostilities and spurious accusations please.
Your confiscation point is valid. I don't know that is an equitable solution because private people did pay into the program at one point.
I suppose what I'd like to see is religions limited to some multiple of working annual budget in assets. This avoids an entire set of perverse negative incentives.
Grandfather it in and prevent further investment or collections until the assets come back to the level specified.
- mattrp 7y agoFair enough I enjoy my relative anonymity here too. The whistleblowers do allege that the profits from investing have not been charitably distributed. But the issue in my meager understanding is not the amounts, it’s whether lds is acting charitably in its totality and I believe that’s fairly undeniable even considering the other controversies mentioned above. But let’s see...