3 ms·
I commend the innovation involved in this shoe, but I wish this shoe did not exist. If you buy the shoe you are buying an advantage, but if you don't, you risk
by francisofascii 7y ago
I commend the innovation involved in this shoe, but I wish this shoe did not exist. If you buy the shoe you are buying an advantage, but if you don't, you risk getting passed by those who do. With Boston qualifying times getting faster each year, people on the bubble will have no choice. With a cost of $250 and a shoe that only lasts two or three races, running got more expensive.
- draw_down 7y agoI suppose the cost is a good point, but I don't see a reason to have a problem with it besides that. Other modern shoes would probably represent an "unfair" advantage when compared with shoes from previous years. The easiest way to remove this variable, of course, would be to hold bare-foot races. But then, what about the shorts and the tank tops...