4 ms·
How about we get into cloud seeding. I’ve seen plans costing it at under $10 billion a year per 1°C decrease. Seems like the most sensible option for me. Ther
by thepangolino 7y ago
How about we get into cloud seeding. I’ve seen plans costing it at under $10 billion a year per 1°C decrease.
Seems like the most sensible option for me.
There’s already ample literature proving the tremendous impact of cloud cover on global temperatures.
- mistrial9 7y agosurgery with a chainsaw works ok, too, in certain cases
- jlevers 7y agoMy understanding is that once you start cloud seeding, you can't really stop...if you stop, you'll have runaway warming at a significantly accelerated rate[0]. I'm pretty wary of geoengineering, just because we don't really know the second/third/nth-order effects geoengineering solutions might have. I'm not saying it should never be done, but I think much more research is in order before doing something that literally affects the entire planet. [0] I believe I learned that from this book (which I thought was excellent), although I'm not 100% sure: https://www.amazon.com/This-Changes-Everything-Capitalism-Climate/dp/1451697392/ https://www.amazon.com/This-Changes-Everything-Capitalism-Cl...
- halfjoking 7y agoAccelerated Olivine weathering is my geoengineering method of choice. It's exactly how the earth brought itself back into equilibrium over millions of years after the mass extinction events. As an added bonus it fixes the acidity of the oceans. For more info check out this project: https://projectvesta.org https://projectvesta.org
- 323454 7y agoThis is really cool but seems almost too good to be true. Why isn't this being talked about more?