4 ms·

I consider The Economist to be a high-brow, high-status publication, but when I see them misspelling in the title, I have to reconsider. “Loth” is not a word. “

I consider The Economist to be a high-brow, high-status publication, but when I see them misspelling in the title, I have to reconsider. “Loth” is not a word. “Loathe” is the word they’re looking for. Find a better educated editor, y’all.

bwanab 7y ago
Loth is a valid British form of loathe: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/loth https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/loth
- Forgivenessizer 7y ago
  interesting. What will the boffins think up next?
- pasttense01 7y ago
  Doesn't The Economist change spellings between British and American editions? For example: "color"--American and "colour"--British?
deleted 7y ago
[deleted]