3 ms·

I'm going to ignore your crazy theory that California might be subject to biblical catastrophe. > You probably believe in curtailing certain personal freedoms

I'm going to ignore your crazy theory that California might be subject to biblical catastrophe. > You probably believe in curtailing certain personal freedoms for other reasons and you are morally justified to do so. Again, nothing personal. The key difference is that I don't want to limit personal freedoms for a specific class of people. That's when it does get personal.

gridlockd 7y ago
> I'm going to ignore your crazy theory that California might be subject to biblical catastrophe. That's not "a theory" I have, that's a sincere belief that religious person might have. Had you been born a century earlier, it probably wouldn't have seemed so crazy to you. > The key difference is that I don't want to limit personal freedoms for a specific class of people. You probably do, but you'd just arbitrarily define what is and isn't a (protected) class of people, so I'll leave it at that.