3 ms·
First I've heard of the suggestion that the cost of a car should be 50% of annual pay. To me that's insane, but then again I view my car as an appliance[0]. [0
by synlatexc 7y ago
First I've heard of the suggestion that the cost of a car should be 50% of annual pay. To me that's insane, but then again I view my car as an appliance[0].
[0] https://oppositelock.kinja.com/i-used-to-take-it-as-a-given-that-an-interest-in-vehicl-1464717649 https://oppositelock.kinja.com/i-used-to-take-it-as-a-given-...
- xboxnolifes 7y ago> ...should not cost more than half of your annual income.
- brianwawok 7y agoUS median household income is 63k. So for a two income house, that would mean two cars costing a total of 31.5k max. A 2020 yaris starts at 15,650. With fees, should be around that mark. The problem is, the median US household does not buy a Yaris. They spend more like double that. So 30-40k PER car, two cars per household.
- perl4ever 7y agoFor a coherent analysis, you should use the median income of two earner households. Two people where one makes $75K and the other makes $50K equals a household of $125K. And it seems obviously extravagant to me for a middle class family to have two new cars. One maybe, but two? But even so, by the formula, the family can afford two $30K cars.
- syshum 7y agoin 2005, the last actual data I could find that lists 2 income households, the median income was $75,293, assuming that income kept pace with inflation that would be $98,562 today not 125K, Such a family would not want to spend more than 49K total on their cars. so that is 1 car for 49K or 2 for 24K and that IMO should be the extreme absolute limit
- SilasX 7y agoI think it's intended as an extreme upper bound, not the optimal value.