3 ms·
> I could see an argument that Buyer 1 was accidentally given this feature, if it was not advertised as present That's not what happened here. Tesla specifical
by resoluteteeth 7y ago
> I could see an argument that Buyer 1 was accidentally given this feature, if it was not advertised as present
That's not what happened here. Tesla specifically advertised the car as having these features when selling it to the dealer. See the image of the Monroney sticker half way down this page: https://jalopnik.com/tesla-remotely-removes-autopilot-features-from-customer-1841472617?rev=1580941196331 https://jalopnik.com/tesla-remotely-removes-autopilot-featur...
- gnicholas 7y agoIs Monroney the auction company?
- drewg123 7y agoIts the name of the window sticker you see in new cars that shows the features, mileage, etc. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monroney_sticker https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monroney_sticker
- jsight 7y agoOne issue that I have with that explanation is that the Monroney may not necessarily be the sole contract between Tesla and the dealer. Without hearing the dealer's side of the story, this part is hard to know conclusively.
- URSpider94 7y agoThe Monroney sticker is only valid for new cars. Yes, the car had FSD when it was new. What Tesla alleges is that when they re-sold the car at auction, they didn’t include FSD. Let’s say a car had a motor swap from a V8 to a V6, and is then sold at auction. Pointing at the Monroney sticker to say the car was sold with a V8 is not relevant.
- johnmarcus 7y agoExcept it wasn't swapped ,it had the v8 in it, as also advertised, and then post auction they broke into your garage and swapped for the v6 because they were unhappy with their final sales price. If the sticker was on the car uncorrected, I beelieve it would hold up in court as advertising.