4 ms·

...but without a sentence or three about the reasons you think Rust is more suited for parallel workloads you are just giving Rust users a bad name again (see R

• UnpossibleJim 7y ago
  That's completely fair, and rather than take on why it handles parallel cycles better during workload better, I tend to take a different approach with Rust and parallelism. I enjoy the compiler and parallel work loads and the elimination (well, reduction, let's face facts) of safety concerns and data races. It isn't that these same things can't be done, and done as well, with other languages but the built in tool chain is done without extension with Rust. Now, there is a learning curve and a different programming paradigm (though not a radically different as I was warned), which I happen to enjoy. It won't be for everyone. No language is. The resources are there and free (online) and I do encourage people with some spare time to give it a spin, but I don't think it's the end of the world if people don't want to =) That being said, I like it, but I tend to use Python more. I wish I had more of a chance to use Rust in my daily life, but I don't use it at work =/