3 ms·
Yes, I am also surprised. This is meant to measure people who "usually" work from home. I wonder how they distinguish counting people who work from home "regu
by Mvandenbergh 7y ago
Yes, I am also surprised.
This is meant to measure people who "usually" work from home.
I wonder how they distinguish counting people who work from home "regularly" in the sense that they do so at least a day every week, people who do so three days a week (arguably meets the definition of "usually"), people who are mostly home based but who regularly go into the offices, and full remote workers.
The latter in particular are still quite rare.
- radicalbyte 7y agoIn the commercial world it's less common but it's really big in the public space. Seems to be part of their whole green thing and a play to cut office costs. Overall 14% feels about right for people who work from home in some way structurally. It's very high in some areas but totally missing in others (anything requiring physical presence).