3 ms·
"Content owners who repeatedly make erroneous claims can have their Content ID access disabled and their partnership with YouTube terminated." I wouldn't mind
by Vysero 7y ago
"Content owners who repeatedly make erroneous claims can have their Content ID access disabled and their partnership with YouTube terminated."
I wouldn't mind seeing a list of "Content owners" who have lost their Content ID access due to "erroneous claims", but I get the feeling that this list simple does not exist. Hell, I would be surprised if the "guidelines" for Content ID use even exist.
"Content owners who repeatedly make erroneous claims can have their Content ID access disabled and their partnership with YouTube terminated."
Of course the users are to take all this on good faith.. you know because YouTube is such a reputably moral and ethical company.
- thomasfortes 7y agoI would bet that this list would have only small content creators that flagged videos. There's no way that the big media companies would be in it, and they are probably the biggest offenders.
- ikeboy 7y agoMost of the issues I've seen with big companies are through automated content ID. The relevant comparison is how many valid manual claims someone makes vs invalid. If there's millions of valid claims and, say, hundreds of invalid claims, I don't think they'd take action.
- ikeboy 7y agohttps://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2605065 https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2605065 Here's guidelines for content ID. And they update policy often - here's a major update from last year: https://youtube-creators.googleblog.com/2019/08/updates-to-manual-claiming-policies.html https://youtube-creators.googleblog.com/2019/08/updates-to-m...
- Vysero 7y agoAh they do exist. Interesting: "You must have exclusive copyright rights to the material in the reference file for the territories where you claim ownership." apparently not.. "The following examples are ineligible for use in or as a reference: Karaoke recordings, remasters, sound-alike recordings, and some dubbed content Sound effects, soundbeds, or production loops " Pretty sure a guy replicating music on a keyboard counts as a "sound-alike recording". "You must provide individual references for each piece of intellectual property." Warner has provided no references to speak of. I am no lawyer but it doesn't sound to me like Warner did their due diligence in following the rules here...
- ikeboy 7y agoThe reference is what Warner would have to upload to YouTube to show the original content being infringed.