3 ms·
>And as far as I read the release, SaaS is not concerned. Unless you're using Apples subscription mechanism, you're not offering a subscription in-app. So if yo
by allwein 16y ago
>And as far as I read the release, SaaS is not concerned. Unless you're using Apples subscription mechanism, you're not offering a subscription in-app. So if you simply use a web API, that's not a subscription.
That's the point that you're missing. If you offer subscriptions or purchases out-of-app for use by the app, You are REQUIRED to offer subscriptions or purchases in-app as well for the same price and minus Apple's 30% cut.
Section 11.13 of the approval guidelines read:
"Apps can read or play approved content (magazines, newspapers, books, audio, music, video) that is sold outside of the app, for which Apple will not receive any portion of the revenues, provided that the same content is also offered in the app using IAP at the same price or less than it is offered outside the app. This applies to both purchased content and subscriptions."
So the whole question comes down to whether SAAS counts as a subscription, content, or otherwise.
- groby_b 16y agoI never even entertained the idea somebody would consider SaaS "content". The thing also lists explicitly what they consider content. There's no "etc." Yes, you can probably bend it to mean anything, but as is, this really doesn't seem to include SaaS.
- bradleyland 16y ago"this really doesn't seem to include SaaS" Today, it doesn't, but based on Apple's ever expanding scope, that's not a bet I'm willing to make. We're sticking to HTML5 web apps and making sure they run on Android browsers as well.
- groby_b 16y agoThat's probably a sound business strategy if you don't want to (or can't afford to) take the cut. I'm not saying "this could never happen". I'm saying "the OP is making stuff up to get page views"