3 ms·
The source literally tells women to wear short dresses? How is that aggressive editorializing?
by elil17 7y ago
The source literally tells women to wear short dresses? How is that aggressive editorializing?
- derision 7y agoBecause it implies that only women were given a suggested dress code when in reality both sexes were given a suggestion. Outrage culture is out of control. People are too damn sensitive
- krapp 7y ago>Because it implies that only women were given a suggested dress code when in reality both sexes were given a suggestion. You know perfectly well that is not what is being implied, nor is it what people take issue with.
- derision 7y agoI don't see any difference between asking a man to wear a suit and asking a woman to wear a skirt.
- gremlinsinc 7y agoWhat if that woman has a scar on her leg and is self-conscious? Why isn't a dinner gown acceptable? Why specifically is showing off legs and sexualizing the woman a requirement? What if they are trans f->m or non-binary and they would rather where a pant suit, or a tuxedo? Gowns can be just as business professional, so can pant suits.
- derision 7y agoIt was just a recommendation. Those things would be fine too in any business setting
- BrandoElFollito 7y ago"short" as in "it can be short of you want, but make it formal" . Longer if always ok