4 ms·
Are you referring to this part? >The announcement capped several chaotic hours in which Chinese media first reported Li’s death, only for the hospital to respo
by Jommi 7y ago
Are you referring to this part?
>The announcement capped several chaotic hours in which Chinese media first reported Li’s death, only for the hospital to respond that Li was alive, though in critical condition.
>Li Wenliang has died, Wuhan Central Hospital confirmed early Friday morning, hours after it initially denied reports of his death.
Where here do you see clear evidence or even indication of deceit?
If someone is in critical condition, that does not mean they are dead. Announcing someone dead just hours after saying someone is in critical condition is, actually, super super logical.
I fear your comment might be quite guided by your unfamiliarity with China and xenophobic touch. Please do take some more time to reflect before posting similar comments again. Thank you.
- s_y_n_t_a_x 7y agoIt's pretty clear the side of history the CPC is on. You only have to look to their concentration camps and what's been happening in Hong Kong. They can't be compared to Western democracies, they are closer to Nazi Germany.
- Jommi 7y agoNot sure what you are aiming for with this response, what part of my comment did you try to respond to? I'm just trying to wrap my head around this comment and see how I could respond. Thanks!
- s_y_n_t_a_x 7y agoI was addressing your accusation against the GP. > your unfamiliarity with China and xenophobic touch. I would argue that he is very familiar with China and his views are not xenophobic but purely rooted in philosophical differences with the Communist Party of China.
- djmips 7y agoMaybe, but wasn't it also reported that the hospital later admitted to trying to resuscitate him for hours when they knew it wasn't possible.