2 ms·
It sounds interesting, although my initial impression is that it sound like it will suffer from the same daunting complexity that afflicted JPEG 2000.
by edflsafoiewq 7y ago
It sounds interesting, although my initial impression is that it sound like it will suffer from the same daunting complexity that afflicted JPEG 2000.
- janwas 7y agoGood news: the reference software (http://gitlab.com/wg1/jpeg-xl http://gitlab.com/wg1/jpeg-xl) can decode about 50 Megapixels/s on a single Skylake core, with 3.1-3.7x speedup on 4 cores. Encoding throughput is configurable from ~1 MP/s to about 50 per core. That's somewhat slower than JPEG, but can be faster with multiple cores.