> While researching this piece, I spoke to a few labor lawyers and ran some Lexis Nexis searches to see just how often a company’s constructive feedback (i.e. n

> While researching this piece, I spoke to a few labor lawyers and ran some Lexis Nexis searches to see just how often a company’s constructive feedback (i.e. not “durrrr we didn’t hire you because you’re a woman”) to a rejected eng candidate has resulted in litigation. It's not "durrrr" and this is why feedback is not given, this immaturity is why people get sued. Many non obvious statements can have implications about illegal discrimination. It is probably very rare, this is a quite valid point people get wrong. But benefits are also probably rare, so it equals out.