3 ms·
I searched and only found something about a vulnerability in "HiSilicone" hardware mentioned yesterday. That article mentions a pre-installed telnet server inc
by IAmEveryone 7y ago
I searched and only found something about a vulnerability in "HiSilicone" hardware mentioned yesterday.
That article mentions a pre-installed telnet server including accounts that can be started with the right command send over TCP. Whereas here, it's apparently a typical buffer overflow resulting in arbitrary (but BYOT (bring your own Telnet)) code execution.
Sure, maybe Cisco is just better at disguising their backdoors for plausible deniability. But with what's known, intent seems far more likely in yesterday's case than this.
- trasz 7y agoA Telnet server is way too obvious for a backdoor. It’s more of a leftover debug feature.
- simion314 7y agoThe article title was different initially and was something that included backdoor,injected,Huawei(was no direct relation with Huawei). There were also many similar reports about US routes and IOT having default passwords or easy to guess passwords but each time the stupidity is assumed. Also the Windows "NSA key" article and comments were very convincing that for sure it was nothing evil and was never used anyway.