4 ms·
I'm of the personal belief that most likely, non-ionizing radiation has no affect on living tissue, but I don't see anything wrong with more open and peer-revie
by deftnerd 7y ago
I'm of the personal belief that most likely, non-ionizing radiation has no affect on living tissue, but I don't see anything wrong with more open and peer-reviewed research into the subject.
It would be nice to know what dangers the most extreme amounts of non-ionizing radiation causes living tissue and biological systems to at least get a modern perspective on the range that things are finally being affected (if at all).
Then we'll be able to more easily say "no effects were found until X amount of energy, and this phone puts out 0.000004% of that" to calm the public down. Until there is a documented reference point that is actually dangerous, people are hesitant to believe any figures showing how safe something is.
- bluGill 7y agoI see something wrong with more research: opportunity cost. All the scientist taking time to study this are not spending their time on paths of research that could result in some new knowledge.